Sorry, I haven't been posting many book
related things lately. I'm kinda sucking at making time to read
lately. My last bit of time at the lake was taking in AS MUCH LAKE
TIME AS POSSIBLE, and not sitting in the cabin reading. I've made my
last trip to the lake this summer worth it. We got to do everything
we wanted and had a blast.
Once I got home the “work” really
began. I had to wash the sheets of our bed 3 days in a row, which is
annoying, and it's weird how sometimes when you have a baby it's
tough to find time to transfer things from the washer to the dryer...
and in this case also find time to put the sheets back on the bed.
Just for the record. No. No one peed the bed, but Roland got a nasty
scrape on his side from wiping out on his bike at the lake. Hasn't
been an issue for a few days, but the day after I decide to wash the
sheets because it's overdue, then he bleeds all over them. So I wash
them again. The next night he wore a shirt to bed, and somehow he
STILL managed to stain the sheets. What the hell, eh? I'd also managed to
procrastinate on vacuuming, washing the handwash dishes, and washing
the doggie laundry. Plus all of the lake related stuff, like the lake
laundry, unpacking, replenishing the fridge... Plus, ya know, the
whole baby thing...
So... not much time for reading...
I do have time to read the newspaper
while I'm eating breakfast and lunch (most of the time). And on
Friday, John Gormley's column caught my eye. Now, for those who
aren't familiar with John Gormley, he is a right wing columnist who
also has his own call-in radio show. Although I rarely ever agree
with the guy, I can't say that I dislike him. After Jack Layton died
last year, he wrote a really nice article about his experiences with
Mr. Layton. He mentioned how they'd banter on air, but during
commercials they would break out pictures of their grandkids. Most of
his columns, I read the first few paragraphs and then roll my eyes at
the blatant right-wingedness of it all and then move on. But Friday's
column made me think “GOOD! I'm not the only one that feels this
way!”...
Gormley's article was about one Shane
Pattison, who was arrested and found to have over 4500 images and
videos depicting child porn, some involving babies. (I followed this
one because Pattison was a familiar face from the correctional
centre. I find I do a lot now that I work at jail. I read the
newspaper articles about the names or faces from jail that I
recognize). When Pattison was sentenced, the paper kept referring to
it as a “watershed moment” in Saskatchewan Law... now, I had no
idea what that meant. Considering that the lawyers seemed pleased
with it, I figured that meant that he was sentenced harshly... but
only 5 years? That didn't seem to make sense. So I had to ask people,
and sure enough, it's thought to be a strict sentence and it will
probably be considered when sentencing future offenders. Gormley had
a great line that fit my reaction perfectly... “Excuse me if I
remain seated, unmoved by the self-congratulatory tone surrounding
this sordid case”. A previous article I had read had stated
that Pattison had knocked up his girlfriend and was talking to others
online about how he planned to use the baby as a sex-toy. This guy is
the WORST type of sexual predator! 5 years in the Penn will give him
just enough time to make a few contacts with other offenders with
similar crimes so they can meet up when they're released and share
gross stuff. Who knows if he will get treatment while at the Penn and
even if he does, will 5 years be long enough to ensure that he is
sufficiently able to deal with his compulsions? I don't think so. Not
to mention that the verdict is still out on whether people can be
“cured” of this kind of disgusting pastime. And the worst part is
that someone else's child will have to be a victim in order for him
to go back to jail again. Not cool.
Gormley also points out that Canadian's
will not be disappointed or oppositional to harsh Child Porn
sentencing. When was the last time you heard someone say “Don't you
think 20 years is a little harsh for someone that had sex with
babies... and then took pictures or videotaped it.... and gave it to
a bunch of people online who enjoyed watching it?” No. I guarantee
that that has never been said by anyone. Gormely gives examples of 3
cases in the United States that are similar where the offender got,
18, 20, or 35 years in prison. Sign him up for that!!
Granted, I realize that the States
probably has a phenomenally bigger budget for jails, but when the
last Federal Election happened, the Conservatives were all about
building more prisons... so... get on that! And throw Pattison in
there for about 4 or 5 times longer than he was sentenced for.
